Posts Tagged ‘Mail on Sunday’

Get Involved

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

In a short while I am going to set off the my local polling station where I shall be vote-telling in the European elections. I have been bracing myself for this for sometime. It is not that I expect to find it monotonous (although I have been told it can be) it is that I want to do it efficiently. It is all part of the political footprint I spoke of in a feature I wrote last week for the Mail on Sunday.

It appeals to me on another level. It is an activity that makes me feel more connected with my community and with the powers that be in Brussels. Through my political activities I have met my Euro MP and several candidates. My point is this: it does not take much time or effort to get involved, and the rewards are considerable. Think about how much better you feel when you view your bank balance regularly. You know how much i there is in your account and you can then manage it properly. It is the same in politics - pay attention to what is going on around you - even in a small way - and you will start to feel a lot better about life

Over the last few weeks we have spent hours debating the moral corruption and selfishness of MPs. In many cases we have every right to do this. Haven’t we fallen a sleep at the wheel, though. Voter apathy is a big problem but to carry on the analogy indifference can be a two-way street. We looked away for long enough and we were taken advantage of.

The best way to stop any kind of horror is to expose it to public scrutiny. That doesn’t mean just reading an online account of your MPs expenses, it means paying attention to the political process. Like our newspapers sometimes we get the politicians we deserve. As Peter Gabriel said of the South African apartheid regime after the death of Steve Biko……”the eyes of the world are watching now.” Steve Biko needed to be politically aware and active. We can’t all be active…but we can be aware.

Mail on Sunday spread

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Following yesterday’s article in the Mail on Sunday I have seen a raft of responses from readers, budding politicians and commentators across the blogosphere. Some of the more interesting reactions were posted on Conservativehome. Although there is a wide spectrum of individual views, the comments appear to fall into two camps. First, there are those who clearly feel that I have “whinged” about my lack of success after such a short period of time on the list and suggest that I should have expected nothing less given my lack of a political footprint or convictions. Secondly, there are those who believe that I have highlighted a particular issue for the Conservative Party and that “something should be done”.

I would like to thank everyone who took the time to comment on the article. Debate is the essence of our democracy and the ability to criticize should be defended at all costs.

However, I should like to take this opportunity to point out a few issues contained within the article which have been misunderstood.

I was not complaining that I felt let down by the Party after less than a year on the list. Rather, I was highlighting that, having got on the list and tried to “start at the bottom”, I was annoyed about Mr Cameron’s reopening the list for “ordinary people”. I noted that his announcement specifically stated that applicants need not have a political history. The absence of this “political history” is central to many of the less positive comments about the article. I am happy - as I stated - to acquire a political footprint. I am less than happy that it would appear that this is now not necessary.

I have not given up trying to be an MP. Quite the reverse. In fact I am off to a local campaign (Zac Goldsmith) meeting in the next half an hour. However, I believe that we should use all the talents at our disposal. Yes, I am able to write for a national newspaper but is that not one of the key skills required for a politician? I note that most of the shadow front bench have, at one time or another in the last 12 months, contributed to newspapers. Indeed, Michael Gove makes a living that way. Being able to communicate on this basis should not preclude my standing and does not, in my opinion, compromise my claim to “ordinariness”.

Finally, let me say that I would like this debate to continue so please keep the comments coming.

We need to get involved more. We need to pay attention to our politicians and the political process. Involvement leads to scrutiny and scrutiny leads to the right standards.