Archive for the ‘Communications’ Category

Am I bothered?

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Am I bothered.

Call me old fashioned but I can’t help liking having an MP who,  I believe acts with integrity and courtesy.

Call me sentimental but I can’t help being  thankful that I have an MP, who yesterday took my daughter and her classmates to present their Send My Friend to School petition for Universal Secondary Education, to No 10, Downing Street and took the time and trouble to buy them hot chocolate at Portcullis House afterwards.

I don’t suppose the clutch of children from St Elizabeth’s School, Richmond will ever forget the day their MP, Zac Goldsmith,  bothered to introduce them to passing ministers, the ex-Home Secretary and some of the new MPs. Sky’s Polictical  Editor, Adam Boulton came over for a chat even your own Daniel Finklestein stopped to say hello in Whitehall.

Can we just let him get on with being a good constituency MP?  He must be worn out with people overlooking his achievement in winning his seat. I certainly am.

Come on Channel 4. I am used to seeing you broadcast real news - not an account of whether Mr Goldsmith spent too much on his campaign anoraks.

Mr Goldsmith’s response on Sky and BBC was an authentic and heartfelt statement of his behaviour. Such a shame Channel 4 did not give him the right to a live right to reply. He asked.

The Real Thing

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Earlier today I appeared on ITV’s This Morning Programme. Apart from the fact that it was a pleasure to meet Philip Schofield and Holly Willoughby it was also a chance to talk about how relieved and happy I am that my son has turned such a corner in dealing with his computer game compulsion. He is genuinely happy at school and has knuckled down to his GCSEs with a view to studying Maths, Geography and History at A Level. With me in the studio was Dr Richard Graham a consultant adolescent psychiatrist who has just opened a unit for technology addiction at the Capio Nightingale Hospital. Before we went on air he asked me what had worked for my son. I told him that in the end - after a lot of heart-ache, micro-management and therapy - it was simple; my son simply rebuilt his own confidence. His school, Hampton Court House, gave him the right structure to develop some self-esteem and he came to the conclusion that Real Life was worth a try after all. Which just goes to show no matter how compelling a virtual game is, it cannot match the Real Thing.

Real Influence

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

This week a debate I attended, held by Carole Stone of YouGovStone, asked the question who has the most influence: Google or Murdoch. Apples and Pears of course;  but it made for a fascinating discussion.

At the end of the debate we were asked, who influences us now? Then; who will influence us in ten years time?  I think the real question is who is influencing our children now? Then; who will influence our children in ten years time.

Before leaving the house my teenage son asked where I was going. I told him about the debate. He asked me if I had ever heard of Phillip DeFranca. I had not.

I had enough to to get online and find out about him. He he is young man who web-cats for three minutes a day on gobal current affairs. He gets between 500,000 and four million views and his influence amongst the 14 to 19-year-old age group is huge.

Few of those at the debate will have heard of him and, although he reaches people through YouTube, I do not believe it is Google who has the influence it is Phil DeFranca. As we move forward the power of individual will increase. If you want to know who is going to be the biggest influence in our lives, try looking over the shoulder of your teenagers as they scour the internet. That is where the answer is.

Learn to Listen

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

This morning BBC Radio 4’s Today programme carried a story which strikes at the heart of some of the worst social issues confronting society. In a report, called the Good Childhood Inquiry, commissioned by the Children’s Society, we heard that the aggressive pursuit of personal success by adults is now the greatest threat to British children. Family break-up, unprincipled advertising, too much competition in education and income equality were mentioned as big contributing factors. The details of Mark Easton’s report made for uncomfortable listening. But listen we must.

According to Martin Seligman, the author of Raising the Optimistic Child, he UK faces an epidemic of teenage depression, knife crime, bullying and chaos on many inner-city classrooms. Some of this I know from reporting on these topics for Tonight With Trevor McDonald: some of it I know as the mother of a troubled but compassionate teenage son who has spent the last year fighting his demons. When a charity such as the Children’s Society appoints a panel of experts to survey 30,000 people over a three year period, I think we should listen to the results.
But Today Presenter John Humphries did not. He tackled Lord Richard Layard , the principal author, as though he was a tight-lipped and evasive politician. Lord Layard clearly wanted to get his message over - after all a great deal of time and effort had gone into the survey. A great many people had been been honest - perhaps inadvertently. In the report the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, says we have become tone deaf to the requirements of children. In many cases this is true. Look at the list of children who have died this year at the hands of parents who should not have had them. Look at the numbers of children frightened and overwhelmed by schools which over emphasize the importance of league tables. The evidence is everywhere.

John Humphries had to wait only a matter of minutes to hear the details of the 33-year-old single mother who, last week, gave birth to eight children when she already had six at home, some born via IVF treatment. She is said to be negotiating deals with two TV programmes and a nappy company. Listeners were told it will cost the US taxpayer $2.5m just to get them through to childhood with the basics. We do not need to argue with the panel of experts. We need to listen.

Mr Humphries should have let Lord Layard take the floor. Every word he had to offer was of value to us all. He was not there as part of an intellectual discussion because what he had to say was important. We are always talking about learning to communicate but we need to learn to listen more.

PS> Mr Humphries talents did, however, appropriately skewer Lord Mandelson.

I like having an MP who has integrity, honesty and courtesy. Call me old fashioned but these qualities matter a great deal to me in an MP. As far as I can make out, and I have spent a long time acquiring the necessary qualities to be a good journalist, Zac Goldsmith has all of these characteristics.

  • You are currently browsing the archives for the Communications category.